Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Performance and benchmark
 Space Force - Rogue Universe Forum : The official English forum : Performance and benchmark
Message Icon Topic: Performance Issues in Dense Sectors Post Reply Post New Topic
Author Message
Torr
Cadet
Cadet
Avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 36
Quote Torr Replybullet Topic: Performance Issues in Dense Sectors
    Posted: 25 Mar 2008 at 00:40
Hi, I just picked this game up the other day. Ever since I installed it, I've been experimenting with the settings, trying to find one I'm satisfied with. It seems like no matter what changes I make, there is a bit of a slowdown or stuttering in dense sectors, such as in Sol or Andromeda. However, in places like the Lynx or Leo sectors, everything runs just fine. Can anyone tell me what I can do to solve this slight problem?
 
My specs are:
 
AMD Athlon XP 2400+ (2 GHz)
PNY Geforce 7600 GS (512 MB) 8xAGP - Latest drivers installed
1 GB DDR 333 RAM
Sound Blaster Audigy EAX
Windows XP Service Pack 2
 
These are the game settings I'm trying to use:
 
Resolution: 1024x768
Color: 32 bit
Refresh Rate: 75 Hz
Texture Quality: High
Sky Box Quality: Medium
Particle count: Low
Light: Normal
Anti-Aliasing: None
Shader model: 3.0
Physics detail: High
 
And everything is checkmarked except Vertical Sync, Filter Screen, and Pixel Doubling.
 
LOD distance is maxed, and Rendering distance is set halfway.
 
Also, EAX 3.0 is enabled, and sound quality is set to High.
 
With these settings, my benchmark score is
 
............................................
Benchmark
............................................
Score: 6198.4
Max FPS: 70.0
Average FPS: 32.1
Min FPS: 5.0
............................................
 
I've turned on Filter Screen and Pixel Doubling and have gotten a higher score on the benchmark, but it takes away the "crispness" of the graphics and makes relatively no difference when it comes to the slowdown in Sol or Andromeda or similar.
 
I've already read about the default settings on another thread, but what would be the best game settings for my computer?
 
Also, out of curiosity, does a higher refresh rate have any major impact on performance?
 
Will the 1.2 patch possibly solve slowdowns like what I'm experiencing?
 
Thanks.


Edited by Torr - 25 Mar 2008 at 00:53
<ANOMALY DETECTED>
[...STAND BY...]
IP IP Logged
LevaOpaki
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Lead programmer

Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Location: Croatia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1369
Quote LevaOpaki Replybullet Posted: 25 Mar 2008 at 10:24
6198.4 is not so big score so it's ok to expect lag and glitches (physics object jumping etc).
Don't use high physics because CPU isn't that fast and I think is much better to use 2.0 shader for that card.


Edited by LevaOpaki - 25 Mar 2008 at 10:24

www.spaceforce-game.com
www.provoxgames.com
IP IP Logged
Torr
Cadet
Cadet
Avatar

Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 36
Quote Torr Replybullet Posted: 25 Mar 2008 at 22:38
Okay, thanks. I'm going to try overclocking my videocard to see if that yields any better results. I've recently read in some reviews that Geforce 7600 GS cards come slightly underclocked compared to the GT model, so I'll play with Riva Tuner a bit and see what happens.
 
EDIT: Okay, I've tweaked my videocard a bit and adjusted a few graphics settings.
 
Graphics changes:
 
Resolution: 1024x768
Color: 32 bit
Refresh Rate: 60 Hz
Texture Quality: High
Sky Box Quality: High
Particle count: Low
Light: Soft
Anti-Aliasing: None
Shader model: 2.0
Physics detail: Normal
 
I've also unchecked Fine LOD and Volumetric Fog.
 
 After running the benchmark, I got the following:
 
............................................
Benchmark
............................................
Score: 8417.6
Max FPS: 95.0
Average FPS: 42.0
Min FPS: 5.0
............................................
A decent improvement. I'll continue experimenting with the graphics and see if I can get better quality with my videocard tweaks. (Right now the core clock is at 500 MHz and the memory clock is at 405 MHz. Appears stable.)
 
EDIT2: Alright, I bumped my core clock up to 560 MHz (on par with the GT model) and everything seems stable.
 
I changed the Particle Count to Medium, enabled Volumetric Fog, and increased the Rendering Distance to Full.
 
The new benchmark score is
 
............................................
Benchmark
............................................
Score: 8201.6
Max FPS: 55.0
Average FPS: 41.6
Min FPS: 5.0
............................................
Average FPS is a .4 difference. Not bad considering that I raised the graphics settings. Overall, this is a substantial improvement over the 20-30 FPS average I had using these same settings before overclocking my videocard.


Edited by Torr - 26 Mar 2008 at 02:56
<ANOMALY DETECTED>
[...STAND BY...]
IP IP Logged
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums version 8.04
Copyright ©2001-2006 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.